Mantua's Robert Zimmerman defends his township's show of support for its police officers.
To the Editor:
This is in response to the Rev. Eric Hafner's recent letter, "Blue lines matter; they're unsafe on N.J. roads," about roadway lines being painted to support police in some communities, including Mantua Township.
To correct any misconceptions, first and foremost, the "blue line" painted in Mantua Township is in Chestnut Branch Park, not on a public roadway. We decided to do this to avoid any confusion to motorists or create a distraction on a public roadway, as Hafner's letter suggests could occur.
Secondly, Mantua's blue line has nothing to do with "protests over so many citizens, mostly black, being killed by police officers," as Hafner writes. This has absolutely nothing to do with "blue lives matter" vs. "black lives matter." In Mantua Township, we strongly believe that ALL lives matter.
Our blue line painted between two yellow lines simply represents our support for our local police as protectors of our community. The added blue center line represents law enforcement. One yellow line represents the public, while the other yellow line represents the criminals. The idea is that law enforcement -- the blue line -- stands between law-abiding residents and violence or victimization by criminals.
To clarify any questions over the line-painting cost, in Mantua, the labor was donated by a private contractor, as were the paint and all other materials.
We have a great police department in Mantua and Mayor Pete Scirrotto, myself and the township committee want to support these men and women. This was just one small gesture that demonstrates our appreciation for these people who serve with honesty, dignity and respect for all citizens.
We strongly believe this to be indicative of our police department and, therefore, support them wholeheartedly.
Robert T. Zimmerman
Deputy Mayor
Mantua Township
N.J. congressman dumped Trump too late
To the Editor:
Like so many other Republican incumbents seeking re-election, U.S. Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-2) is backing away from support for the party's presidential candidate, Donald Trump. It seems that this spirit was triggered by the "hot microphone" tape revealing Trump's "locker-room banter" degrading women.
While it is laudable for LoBiondo to distance himself from Trump, I am troubled as to why this didn't happen sooner. After all, there has been a consistent pattern of disrespect from Trump toward former POWs, war heroes, women, the disabled and minorities -- all of whom are part of the congressman's constituency.
A possible reason for this is the fact that Trump (a former Atlantic City casino owner) and his executives have donated thousands of dollars to LoBiondo's campaign war chest over two decades.
I think now, more than ever, it is time for new blood and a new attitude in the House of Representatives from New Jersey's Second District. I am impressed by LoBiondo's Democrat challenger, David Cole, and his experience, his ideas, his enthusiasm and his vision for our nation.
Here's a question for LoBiondo: Do you intend to refund Trump's past contributions as you distance yourself from his candidacy?
Jim Atkins
Sewell
Evangelicals have voting dilemma
To the Editor:
Evangelicals are in a dilemma. Do we ignore Donald Trump's moral ineptitude and "locker room talk" to focus on the greater issues of the economy, foreign policy and appointing strict constitutionalists to Supreme Court? Or, do we simply choose not to vote?
Many people believed that when Bill Clinton was president, his morals and character didn't matter. I wasn't one of them, but now we have the problem of choosing a president from among two candidates with character issues.
William McGurn, in an Oct. 11 Wall Street Journal column, wrote "Donald Trump is the new Bill Clinton." The writer suggests that Trump is the consequence of the culture that both Bill and Hillary Clinton created.
However, Mr. Clinton's inexcusable behavior in the Oval Office involved disgracing the highest office in the land. Hillary was his enabler. His failure to resign despite an impeachment vote speaks loudly of our leaders' unwillingness to uphold the sacred trust of the presidency.
Likewise, the failure to indict Mrs. Clinton over her email scandals when she was secretary of state shows the lawlessness of the current administration.
The erosion of godly biblical values has resulted in the loss of absolute truth, allowing many to be their own gods. The issues we face as a country are the result.
John Adams once said, "Our constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."
In this election, thinking about long-term policy results is very important for each of us.
Barbara Essington
Carneys Point Township
Send a letter to the editor of South Jersey Times at sjletters@njadvancemedia.com